Choosing between the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 and the Glock 19 is a common dilemma for gun enthusiasts, especially those interested in concealed carry. Both are incredibly popular, reliable, and feature-rich handguns, but their differences cater to different preferences and needs. This in-depth comparison will help you decide which pistol best suits your shooting style and intended use.
Key Differences: A Head-to-Head Comparison
Both the S&W M&P 2.0 and the Glock 19 are striker-fired, semi-automatic pistols chambered in 9mm, making them excellent choices for self-defense. However, several key distinctions set them apart:
Ergonomics and Grip
-
S&W M&P 2.0: Features a more aggressive, textured grip, often praised for its enhanced control and reduced felt recoil. The interchangeable backstraps allow for customized fit, accommodating a wider range of hand sizes. Many shooters find the M&P 2.0 more comfortable to hold and shoot, particularly during extended range sessions.
-
Glock 19: Known for its simpler, more minimalist grip texture. While effective, it's less aggressive than the M&P 2.0's. The lack of interchangeable backstraps might make it less comfortable for individuals with smaller or larger hands. However, its simplicity contributes to its ease of maintenance and cleaning.
Trigger
-
S&W M&P 2.0: Offers a slightly improved trigger pull compared to previous M&P iterations, with a crisper break and shorter reset. While still a striker-fired trigger, it generally feels smoother and more refined than the Glock 19's trigger.
-
Glock 19: The Glock trigger is known for its long, somewhat heavy pull, and its somewhat abrupt break. While reliable and safe, it's often considered less refined than the M&P 2.0's trigger, especially for those accustomed to a lighter, more responsive trigger pull. This, however, is a matter of personal preference and familiarity.
Features and Controls
-
S&W M&P 2.0: Includes an ambidextrous slide release and magazine release, making it suitable for both right- and left-handed shooters. It also features a loaded chamber indicator and a visually clear takedown process.
-
Glock 19: Features a reversible magazine release but lacks an ambidextrous slide release. Its simpler design, while reliable, offers fewer features. The takedown process, although simple, differs significantly from the M&P 2.0's.
Accuracy and Reliability
Both pistols boast exceptional reliability and accuracy. Minor variations in accuracy might depend on individual ammunition and shooter skill. Both are known for their consistent performance under diverse conditions.
Price and Availability
Pricing can fluctuate depending on retailer and market conditions. Generally, both the S&W M&P 2.0 and the Glock 19 fall within a similar price range, making price a less significant factor in the decision-making process. Availability can vary based on regional demand and current market trends.
Which Pistol is Right for You?
The best choice ultimately depends on your individual needs and preferences:
-
Choose the S&W M&P 2.0 if: You prioritize a more comfortable and customizable grip, a smoother trigger pull, and ambidextrous controls. Its features cater to a wider range of hand sizes and shooting styles.
-
Choose the Glock 19 if: You value simplicity, reliability, and a well-established reputation. Its minimalist design makes it easy to maintain and clean, and its widespread popularity ensures ample aftermarket support and accessories.
Conclusion
Both the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 and the Glock 19 are excellent handguns. There’s no single "better" option; the best choice hinges on your personal shooting style, hand size, and desired features. It is strongly recommended to handle and shoot both pistols, if possible, before making a final decision. This hands-on experience will provide the most valuable insight into which pistol feels better and functions most effectively for you.
